tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4807621660146365262.post777194505229108716..comments2022-11-21T03:43:58.782-06:00Comments on Regardant les nuages: Part Two: History vs PhilosophyUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4807621660146365262.post-66533310637557133322010-10-14T00:10:37.592-06:002010-10-14T00:10:37.592-06:00Lindsey won. Hands down.Lindsey won. Hands down.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4807621660146365262.post-54185371245951118172008-08-06T22:28:00.000-06:002008-08-06T22:28:00.000-06:00interesting discussion. i've had these types of de...interesting discussion. i've had these types of debates before (physics vs. philosophy), where it seems like both parties are talking by one another, heels dug in stubbornly, but in the end agreeing that they are on the same side, just coming to the answer on opposed trajectories.<BR/>i remember a history professor asking: does history make great men, or do great men make history? i think your debate asks the same question.<BR/>it is probably 6 of one, half a dozen of the other. As any good student of kant remembers, "Concepts without percepts are empty; percepts without concepts are blind." <BR/>Something like squaring the rational vs. empirical circle...Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com